I figure I'm supposed to be excited about the prospects for a new arena in Seattle, that it might come with a basketball team, and maybe hockey to boot. "Didn't you put a
Sonics logo on every single art project from 2nd-6th grade," you ask. Yes, you'd be correct. Color me skeptical, but I'll believe it when it happens.
In addition to that, it would seem weird to obtain a team in a manner similar to how the Sonics were
given away for cents on the dollar by genius Starbucks owner Howard Schultz who should have seen their eyes light up with dollar signs, said to himself "huh? let's check the blue book on this thing... maybe they don't really intend to keep this team in Seattle after all - ooh, is Greg Oden hurt again? sorry Portland" stolen. The only way I would even harbor that thought is if that team was itself stolen from another city.
The decision to retrofit the old Coliseum in a way that it was obsolete to the NBA within a decade with a hockey capacity too small for the NHL to even consider is a travesty. There are several issues in play regarding the acquisition of any team in both sports.
NBA first.
Sacramento Kings. Obviously they come to mind because the Maloofs over leveraged their casinos in the last decade. They can't afford to tip their waitress more than 10%, how can they afford to keep their team? I don't know. I do know their mayor spent about 13 years playing in the NBA, and probably views keeping their only big-sport team to be a priority. I also know that Anaheim has a NBA-ready arena and if forced to decide today between a plot of fill next to Elliott Bay and a turn-key situation that doesn't even require them to leave the state, they're moving south. (If either city starts seeking state-level help, California would probably prefer to keep whatever tax revenue is generated somewhere within its boundaries.) The Kings, it's worth noting, moved from Kansas City to Sacramento. I would feel worse about that, but KC themselves stole the Kings from Cincinnati, 15 years after THEY took the team from Rochester. The only team that's moved more often than that is the Harlem Globetrotters.
New Orleans Hornets. Probably the most-eligible candidate - they don't have an owner. Attendance has struggled, and that is squarely in the heart of football country. The biggest problem here is probably getting David Stern on board. Returning a team to Seattle during his tenure will require some pretty serious politicking. The Hornets have only been in New Orleans about ten years since they abandoned Charlotte. The irony would be pretty thick that if Katrina hadn't forced them to spend most of two years playing in Oklahoma City to huge crowds, the bargain hunters their may not even have come sniffing after the Sonics.
Memphis Grizzlies. I've heard no serious whispers about them for the past few years, so the wishful thinking here mostly centers around the former Vancouver, BC team returning to their regional roots. If you follow Bill Simmons at all, you get a strong feeling that that team was badly mismanaged player personnel-wise during its BC tenure, and that maybe they would have survived under better leadership from their basketball people. Objectively, this would also allow the league to move the Zombie Sonics to the Southwest Division where they more naturally fit with the three Texas teams than the Northwest Division against teams from cities were we actually get winter.
Now, the NHL.
I have not heard any other teams mentioned than the
Phoenix Coyotes as potential moves, which is fine. A hockey team in Arizona never ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever was going to make sense. They literally couldn't fit in the Phoenix Suns' arena (sounds like it was built exactly like KeyArena to me) with lots of obstructed views and an arena floor not designed to go from one to the other. Since the gaping hole left when they abandoned in Winnipeg has already been filled, that clearly leaves Seattle as a viable destination.
Some questions remain: if they had to spend a season or two in the region while the new joint is built, where would that be? My first thought was, "well duh, they play in Key just to get by". But why not think bigger than that? Make this Washington's (and Oregon's) team. The home season's 80 games - play 20 at Key to establish their "home" footing, then split the remaining 20 between the hockey-ready WHL buildings in Spokane, Kennewick and Portland. It's only been the last 20 years or so that this became rarer. The Buffalo Bills playing one game in Toronto every year comes to mind but there may be others. The Boston Celtics used to do home games in Hartford, the Clippers dipped their own toe in Anaheim for a few years. Even the Mariners played a series in Vancouver just long enough to turn Edgar Martinez into a DH.
In our house, having tried and failed to interest the single-digit crowd in basketball has repeatedly proved unsuccessful. But an NHL team? That's the ticket. We couldn't interest them in the Super Bowl, but the
NHL All-Stars Skills competition? We're clearing a Saturday.
I look forward to both prospects, and will undoubtedly buy the t-shirts and watch the games when they happen. But until then, I'll wait and see.